Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-20 20:55:12 EDT --- Can you indicate where you see a statement that this package is under LGPLv3? All I see is the COPYING file, which has the usual language indicating that any LGPL version applies unless there is some indication of a specific choice of version. This would indicate LGPLv2+ (since there was no LGPLv1). In case you don't know and don't like typing, you can write BuildArchitectures: as just BuildArch:. Is there any reason to have the "data" directory, instead of just putting the monomers directly into %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}? It just seems a bit odd to have two successive directories with nothing in them except for another directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review