Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-20 11:43:02 EDT --- For -4: * Soname (In reply to comment #10) > Ok, I spoke with upstream about the soname issue. They basically said that I > should start the versioning at 0.0.0 and they will continue with 1.0.0 on the > next release (3.2.24). I will make that change and upload new rpm and spec > file. - In such case the SONAME of this library should be libsnmp++.so.0, not libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 (while the _name_ of this library can be libsnmp++.so.0.0.0) * undefined non-weak symbols - $ rpmlint snmp++ (you can try rpmlint on installed rpm) reports some undefined non-weak symbols on libsnmp++.so.0.0.0. (you can also check this by $ ldd -r %_libdir/libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 ) For packages providing -devel subpackages, leaving these symbols cannot be allowed because this causes linkage error. It seems that making libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 linked against libssl.so resolves this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review