Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #4 from John F <johnhford@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-11 00:09:42 EDT --- Hi Fabian, Just a couple questions: 1. I notice that in a lot of documentation it states that timestamps should be preserved. Is this for auditing reasons mainly? 2. The documentation that I found for dealing with desktop files still says to use fedora as a vendor. Is it appropriate for me to update this page on the wiki? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files) I have made the changes as you recomended and have uploaded a new specfile and srpm at: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links.spec http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Thank you very much for your time! John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review