Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-10 06:52:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Nope, the rule I referenced would have been > > <alias> > <family>HanaMin</family> > <default> > <family>serif</family> > </default> > </alias> > > The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja > test. Doh, just referred the wrong thing.. :( > The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after > conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed > before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Ah, ok. > Thus I'd advise to > 1. keep your original rule > 2. add the one I just wrote > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio > 4. test test test Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow. > > > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 > > > > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing > > hereafter? > > It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as > Fedora 8 in un-supported. I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you because it's going to be EOL'd soon. BTW just noticed that I can't see any annotations on the template page. I had to do the view source to see. dunno if it's a problem on my browser, or mediawiki's bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review