Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #25 from Rick L Vinyard Jr <rvinyard@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-07 15:59:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > 1* Fix License to LGPLv2+ > I don't think there is a LGPLv2 short name as every files under 2.1 should be > redistributable under 3 with the LGPL case (in the contrary of the GPL). There is an LGPLv2 short name: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing I think this one falls under the LGPLv2 only since the accompanying documentation includes this line in README.html: Terms of Usage The terrain renderer is licensed under the terms of the LGPL 2.1. No warranty WHATSOEVER is expressed; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE! If it had the phrase "under the terms of the LGPL 2.1 or any later version" then it would be LGPLv2+, but I think the docs keep it at LGPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review