Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-29 07:07:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > mingw32-filesystem.src: W: strange-permission mingw32-find-provides.sh 0775 > mingw32-filesystem.src: W: strange-permission mingw32-find-requires.sh 0775 > No idea why these are group writable in the srpm, but it doesn't really matter. They are installed with the correct permissions anyway. > mingw32-filesystem.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 > Obviously that's intended and accepted by the guidelines; it would be nice to > get rpmlint to accept this. Could you file a ticket? Bug 468981. > Otherwise, I have one remaining question about the two files placed in > /etc/profile.d: what would be set here? Is the point to eventually add things > to $PATH or set some specific environment variables? Because it seems a bit > odd to add two files there which contain nothing but comments. Yes, those were intended to store environment variables, but since we never got around to using them for anything, I have removed them from the latest version. SRPM: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-filesystem-33-1.fc10.src.rpm Spec: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-filesystem.spec * Wed Oct 29 2008 Richard Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> - 33-1 - Remove mingw32.{sh,csh} which are unused. * Mon Oct 27 2008 Richard Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> - 32-1 - Add mingw32-configure script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review