[Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597





--- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-28 12:29:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-6.fc9.src.rpm
- So for license "GPLv2+" for ext/q_parser.c can be ignored by Bison exception
term
  (you can regard that ext/q_parser.c are under "BSD or GPLv2+")
  Please use "BSD and MIT" for license tag.

> I'm not sure whether I should package the tests provided with the gem in -doc
> or in the base package... Please advise.
I would move these files to -doc (if I create -doc subpackage), however
this is under your choise.

By the way:
- I recommend to use %{version} tag for Source0:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D

  Also, the number "28549" in URL of Source0 will change each time the version
  is upgraded. If you don't like this, gem has alternative URL:
  http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem

- Please make it sure that the directory %{geminstdir} itself is also
  owned by this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]