[Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517





--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-28 12:08:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I quite don't understand if you still insist on not owning the package. In case
> yes, I don't see what would we gain here, except for having a slight
> possibility of the package leaving a stale unowned directory.

* Please be consistent with other packages
  - Currently only 1 (binary) package (shared-mime-info) owns /usr/share/mime
  - While 81 packages have files under /usr/share/mime/packages (including
shared-mime-info)

If you want to make it sure that /usr/share/mime is owned by some packages
when shared-mime-info is not installed (current packaging guidelines is against
this), this is for packaging guidelines issue (you can suggest that this 
directory must be in filesystem package or so).

ref:
  - 18 packages (??) own /usr/share/icons/hicolor
  - While 637 packages have files under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps

* And I don't think that XML files under the directory are useful
  when shared-mime-info is not installed.

> > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
I don't see this SEGV on -3, thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]