[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737





--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-10-27 05:09:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> 1. Why don't you have just one patch for the fortran-related stuff? Remove
> commented sed line.
The first is the patch sent upstream. The second is the patch against configure
which ends to be specific with the sources version used.
> 2. To my understanding you don't need the zlib patch, since you require zlib >=
> 1.2.3 (the bug is only present in zlib 1.2.2). Remove patch0.
wrong, there is nothing common with the zlib 1.2.2 bug and the
undefined-non-weak-symbol related to a missing -lz at link time.
> 3. Remove all rpath related stuff, matio builds fine without them.
wrong, not in x86_64 at least. The cause is the autotools version used to
generate the source archive.
> 4-5-6. man doxygen and pdf is the same content. Thus to provide the 3

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]