Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-26 23:18:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > The following are not packaged: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > * ASNMP/asnmp/address.cpp MIT > * TAO/CIAO/tools/IDL3_to_IDL2/be_extern.h LICENSE-A > * TAO/TAO_IDL/contrib/mcpp/directive.cpp MIT > * contrib/minizip/zip.h zlib > * contrib/utility/Example/ExH/BadCast/bad_cast.cpp zlib They may not be packaged, but they are used. I'm not at all concerned about the MIT or zlib items (or the Bison output files), those licenses are pretty much universally compatible. Its the LICENSE-A items that need to be removed or replaced upstream, because that license is non-free, and almost certainly incompatible with the DOC license. * TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/AV/RTCP.cpp BSD with advertising This one might be a problem if it linked into GPL items, but I don't think it is an issue here (although apps/gperf/src/Gen_Perf.h being GPLv2+ might complicate things). I would try to get the copyright holder to simply drop the advertising clause on that code. The next steps will be to address the issue with upstream, all of the code under LICENSE-A (aka Sun Interface Definition Language CFE License) needs to either be removed or replaced in the source tree (whether or not it ends up in a package is immaterial). 99% Free code + 1% Non-Free code = 100% Non-Free binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review