Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-26 23:14:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904080&name=build.log uses > the tgz to build the gem and then install the gem, but has left-over .o files > installed > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904141&name=build.log is the > next attempt and cleans out those .o files, but the ext/ferret_ext.so.debug > file makes the rpm build bork nonetheless. This is one of the main reasons why > I couldn't find a way to use or build and then use the gem itself. Sorry, however other maintainer handles this. Please fix this. Example A (my case) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-zoom/devel/rubygem-zoom.spec?view=co Example B (spec file by sseago) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-mongrel/devel/rubygem-mongrel.spec?view=co(In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #13) > > (In reply to comment #12) > > > I found GPLv2+ too in ext/q_parser.c. Pending other comments, I'll push these > > > changes when we're done. > > Please also check Bison exception mentioned in the file. > > The Bison exception is a "may remove (at your option)" which I'm not sure makes > sense; how should I note this in the RPM License tag if it should be included > in the RPM License tag? Simply use "License: MIT and BSD". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review