Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #25 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-15 15:03:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Well, while I does not have nVidia (I use intel), when I switch > to vesa there does not seem to have any problem on this package. > So for now I assume that there is something wrong with > either X driver or mesa. > > So, @Tim if you have something you want to modify on your srpm > would you do so and post on this bug the newest of URLs of your spec/srpm > _anyway_ ? Then I will recheck your srpm again. I bumped my SVN rev to 3468, and according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251#c21, it seems like its a candidate release package. So, going by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines, would a name like: pymol-1.1-20081015svn3468.CR2.tar.gz (version 1.1 candidate release 2, svn rev 3468) be OK for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review