Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-08 15:45:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I uploaded a new version: > http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec > http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-2.fc8.src.rpm > > I tried to cross-mock it for fedora-devel-x86_64 on a i386, without success > (missing basic dependencies at yum time). Perhaps there is a trick I did not > find on the web/forums....? You can't do that. You need an x86_64 machine. If you were already a Fedora packager, you could use koji --build file.src.rpm. > The new version fixes what seems to be the problem on x86_64... but I can't > check it without the access to a 64bit machine and without knowing the above > mentioned trick, if it exists. I'm sure the reviewer will check that. [...] > For the binary name, the question is the same as for the package name (see > comment #2). Cygwin developers know it as such, and Debian has kept it > unchanged. I also fear CLI users will be puzzled by another name. If you really > want to change it, do you have any naming proposals ? FWIW, I'm pretty sure the binary name is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review