Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Monnerat <pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-08 15:20:32 EDT --- I uploaded a new version: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-2.fc8.src.rpm I tried to cross-mock it for fedora-devel-x86_64 on a i386, without success (missing basic dependencies at yum time). Perhaps there is a trick I did not find on the web/forums....? The new version fixes what seems to be the problem on x86_64... but I can't check it without the access to a 64bit machine and without knowing the above mentioned trick, if it exists. It also uses the system-installed "readline" and uses "expat". Mocks for i386. No rpmlint report. Runs on i386 fc8. For the binary name, the question is the same as for the package name (see comment #2). Cygwin developers know it as such, and Debian has kept it unchanged. I also fear CLI users will be puzzled by another name. If you really want to change it, do you have any naming proposals ? Thanks for your time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review