Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2008-10-02 04:52:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > BuildRequires: openmpi-devel > > FYI: Alternatives support in openmpi will probably be gone in next release > (it's already gone from lam), so you might need something like this in the > future: > > BuildRequires: environment-modules > and > . /etc/profile.d/modules.sh > module load %{_libdir}/openmpi/*/openmpi.module > before ./configure with mpi OK. Do you have any idea how this works in RHEL5? The newest update includes the mpi-selector tool, which puts the MPI bin dir into the path. > export CFLAGS="%optflags -Wa,--noexecstack" > > Could this CFLAGS addition be limited only to files that need it? That'd > require some Makefile.in patching, of course. Well, that would be of course nicer, but the flag only operates on assembly files anyways :) > However, none of the above are blockers, so feel free to fix them after the > package is imported. Good work. > > APPROVED Thanks for bearing with me. > Based on this package and your reviews of other packages, I'm sponsoring you. > Please request "packager" group membership in the Fedora Account System and > I'll approve your request. Welcome aboard! Done. (Spec and SRPMS still in the same place.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review