Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-01 20:29:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > > License: GPLv2+ > Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+ > sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix I'm not sure, but I think it's not linking, but distributing libxc as part of octopus (or is that "mere aggregation"?) that affects the license. However, the license tag could definitely stay at GPLv2+ if you package libxc separately and only link against it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review