[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426





--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-30 12:35:17 EDT ---
For 0.8-3:

* License
  - All codes with explicitly licensed are under LGPLv3 strict.
    Also, icons included in the tarball are under CC-BY-SA.
    So the license tag should be "LGPLv3 and CC-BY-SA".

* Patch
  - What is this patch for? It seems after you apply this patch
    you modify what is changed by this patch by using sed again...
    I guess using sed from the beginning is better.

* Requires
  - Are gstreamer-plugins-base, gstreamer-plugins-good _really_
    needed? 
    More verbosely, is gstreamer-java out of work when
    gstreamer-plugins-base or gstreamer-plugins-good are not
    installed? I guess what you mean here is
    "Conflicts: gstreamer-plugins-base < 0.10.19" or so.

* rpmlint
-------------------------------------------------------------
gstreamer-java.src: E: description-line-too-long An unofficial/alternative set
of java bindings for the gstreamer multimedia framework.
-------------------------------------------------------------
  - One line in %description must contain less than 80 characters.

? About this line for swt.jar:
-------------------------------------------------------------
$(find %{_libdir} -name swt*.jar 2>/dev/null|sort|head -1)
-------------------------------------------------------------
  - Can't this part be replaced by $(build-classpath swt)?

* Documents
  - Please add the following to %doc (of main package)
-------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGES
COPYING*
-------------------------------------------------------------

* %changelog
  - The last entry in %changelog does not coincide with current
    srpm EVR (Epoch-Version-Release).

! By the way as you say this srpm does not build on rawhide.
  Would you file a bug (perhaps against jna) so that we can
  keep track of this issue?
  dist-f10 build:
  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=850032

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]