Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-23 11:43:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > But the [1] is still problem, you just mask the problem so rpmlint do not > detect it. I do not understand why do you have this part there at all: [1] was a false positive by rpmlint. %{buildroot} isn't being "used" in %prep so much as embedded into the provides filtering script... This is not an error. Swizzling the value into %{broot} simply keeps rpmlint from wearning about an error that isn't. So long as rpm insists on doing provides/requires detection in %{_docdir}, it's going to be easier and more consistent to prevent the content of that directory from being scanned to begin with. (As a side note, I didn't realize a RFE to remove %{_docdir} scannning from autoprov/req hadn't been filed... filed now as bug 463461.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review