Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #34 from Claudio Tomasoni <claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-25 17:26:29 EDT --- Thanks for the comments. Before pointing to a new SRPM and SPEC file, I've got a couple of questions. - Would you tell me whether the tarball you are using is post- or pre- release of version 0.7.5? According to the news.txt file this seems to be a post-release of 0.7.5, while according to http://qtoctave.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/qtoctave-081-testing/, and to the help file this version seems to be a pre-release of 0.8.1. Which adopt? - For svn based tarball, I prefer to use revision number rather than the date you checked out. So the package should be named 0.8.1-1.svn165 (revision is 165)? Thanks in advance for your attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review