Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-21 13:31:31 EDT --- APPROVAL REVOKED (In reply to comment #6) > > This package should own /usr/share/tqsl, I think. > I do not think it is necessary as config.xml won't be modified. Then I have no choice but to revoke my approval. Modification isn't the issue; if this package doesn't own /usr/share/tqsl, then no package will own it and that is a blocker. Unless you can convince me I'm wrong, I can't approve this package. It is of course a good idea to test all software, but automated test suites are not always possible. I am trusting that you have either tested this software or tested the software which depends on it, and that you will respond to bug reports related to this software in an appropriate manner. The reviewer isn't really the QA agent; when I know how, I will try to run software when possible to make sure that it at least does something but when a ticket sits around in the queue for over a month I figure that nobody with the necessary expertise is going to turn up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review