[Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-20 18:28:56 EDT ---
Just a few comments:

Builds OK; rpmlint just says:
  tqsllib-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency 
   /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
which indicates that the library is linked against libm without actually
calling any functions in it.  This isn't a significant issue, but if it
concerns you then there's a workaround at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency

The source URL seems to be wrong; sourceforge just endlessly redirects me.

/usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1 and /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1.0.0 are duplicated
between the main and -devel packages.

There shouldn't be any reason to run ldconfig on the -devel package.

If you really want to package the static library you can, but it needs to be in
a separate -static subpackage.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]