Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-20 18:05:48 EDT --- #patch1 -p1 #patch2 -p1 #make check VERBOSE=yes > make_check.log 2>&1 || (cat make_check.log && false) I'd reduce this commented-out boilerplate # dumb redhat-rpm-config replaces config.{sub,guess} with ancient ones in %%configure, use ./configure instead: It would seem more prudent to file a bug against redhat-rpm-config, instead of adding a comment like that. %{_libdir}/libltdl.a %{_libdir}/libltdl.la libtool archives should not be packaged at all (though that has a certain irony in this particular review...), static libraries need to be shipped in a -static subpackage if there is a reason to package them. I still have doubts that going for parallel installation is really the best move. Other distros manage to build the entire universe with libtool 2, no ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review