Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459549 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-19 23:14:04 EDT --- A few comments: python-ethtool.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ethtool.so 0775 This should probably not be group-writable. python-ethtool.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized ethtool python bindings Kind of self-explanatory. python-ethtool.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-3 0.2-1.fc10 You should have a changelog entry matching every version you release. python-ethtool.x86_64: W: no-url-tag Is there really no upstream for this package? It is very strongly suggested that there be an independent upstream source for everything in Fedora. Is the license really GPLv2+? The source would seem to indicate GPLv2 only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review