Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #13 from leigh scott <leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-18 21:42:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > (In reply to comment #10) > > > > .pm files are are not intended to be run directly rather .pl files are and they > > > don't generally don't need she-bang. > These are perl-modules, which must NOT be executable nor do they need a > she-bang. > > > > But you will need to investigate why that one of these files most probably > > > mksplit has an issue. > > No, it doesn't have one. mksplit is a script. > > > But there are other issues with your package: > > 1) It is wrong to rename install-info/cleanup-info. These are different tools > than the ones in Fedora and must be installed to /usr/sbin, otherwise dpkg will > not work. > > 2) Installing dpkg's (dpkg-)update-alternatives daemon doesn't make any sense > on Fedora, because these are provided by other packages in Fedora. > > 3) Packaging (dpkg-)start-stop-daemon also hardly makes sense. I recommend to > not building nor installing it. (%configure --without-start-stop-daemon) 1) I didn't rename install-info/cleanup-info intentionally and dpkg-install-info/dpkg-cleanup-info are installed to /usr/sbin and appear to work properly. 2) should I just add "rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/dpkg-update-alternatives" to the SPEC file to remove it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review