Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken <lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-14 19:13:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint complains that the license is unknown. The spec defines it as PSF or > ZPL. > > The possiblilities for ZPL are: ZPLv1.0, ZPLv1.0+, ZPLv2.0, ZPLv2.0+, ZPLv2.1, > or ZPLv2.1+ > Is PSF the Python license? I believe so, yes. I'm not quite sure about what to do with the License tag, as it says "PSF or ZPL" in the docs... > The %doc files all have executable permissions!? (e.g. > /usr/share/doc/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev/Indexing.txt) Fixed. > The changelog version doesn't match the RPM version: 1.0-1 vs 0.5a1.dev-0.2569 Fixed. > The Source0 URL is incorrect. I found it at > http://peak.telecommunity.com/snapshots/ Fixed. http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules.spec http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review