[Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177


Rob Crittenden <rcritten@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rcritten@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #1 from Rob Crittenden <rcritten@xxxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-14 18:39:48 EDT ---
rpmlint complains that the license is unknown. The spec defines it as PSF or
ZPL.

The possiblilities for ZPL are:  ZPLv1.0, ZPLv1.0+, ZPLv2.0, ZPLv2.0+, ZPLv2.1,
or ZPLv2.1+
Is PSF the Python license?

The %doc files all have executable permissions!? (e.g.
/usr/share/doc/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev/Indexing.txt)

The changelog version doesn't match the RPM version:  1.0-1 vs 0.5a1.dev-0.2569

The Source0 URL is incorrect. I found it at
http://peak.telecommunity.com/snapshots/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]