Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #42 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-06 04:05:38 EDT --- Ok. lets start review again with new maintainer. rpmlint on binary gave me redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 ld-linux.so.2 redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig ==> Ok redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch ==> As explained in SPEC needed these LSB Profile files and as they are not having any contents no issue of marking as conffile. redhat-lsb.i386: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 redhat-lsb.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 redhat-lsb.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 ==> Not sure about this for now redhat-lsb.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ==> From LSB documentation page 460 this looks ok. redhat-lsb.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.1-22 3.1-21.fc10 ==> Change Release tag in SPEC rpmlint on SRPM gave redhat-lsb.src:361: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb redhat-lsb.src:379: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/install_initd redhat-lsb.src:380: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd ===> From spec comment its ok As comment in SPEC said "# LSB uses /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib64 even for 64bit OS" you should revert your changes 437c436 < /lib/lsb --- > /%{_lib}/lsb otherwise there will be problem on 64bit machine as those files will be installed in /usr/lib64 cp command should be used like "cp -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review