Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 ------- Additional Comments From dan@xxxxxxxx 2008-08-01 05:28 EST ------- formal review is here, please read the notes bellow OK source files match upstream: e827ada394aff91f9c539cee35e946e81152426c arpd-0.2.tar.gz 342cc53e8d23c84ecb91c7b66c6e93e7ed2a992a honeyd-1.5c.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. BAD dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. BAD license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. BAD compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. BAD package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). ?? debuginfo package looks complete. ?? rpmlint is silent. ?? final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - you should standardize on using one of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - you should add the %dist tag - arpd is licensed under BSD, so the right license tag is "GPLv2+ and BSD" - missing BR: readline-devel, zlib-devel - aprd doesn't build on 64-bit platforms (it checks for libevent and libpcap only in ${prefix}/lib and checks for static lib only) - CFLAGS are reset to "" in configure.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review