Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx 2008-07-29 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > > To summarize thread: > > I would like stay with this stable (no matther that 2 subdrivers are broken), > its not my first GIS package for fedora, there was others GIS related where I > offered upstream large 64biness clean and license-due whole chunks rewrites, I > ATM simply failed with this one mapnik and its a question of time to solve it. > I just expressed some frustrations regarding this particular package, lets > not detail more, i will try manage tham ASAP. > > Tasaka, if Tom (spot) approve that non-trivial license issue can we go further? > > //cristian. The work that you have done so far is great and I'm both grateful and relieved that someone else took up the challenge. However please send your patches upstream - you have still yet to make any comments on the development mailing list for this project - they can then be merged into the stable branch as suggested. I have found them to be extremely receptive and responsive to what I have sent. Sending patches upstream is one of the core principles of packaging for Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream I would urge you to convert the sed processing and other code-munging present in the .spec file into a patch and post it to the relevant list. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review