Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009 jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-21 15:47 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm. + Rpmlint is quite on debuginfo rpm. + License is an open source license. + Package contains verbatin copy of the licens. + Usage of rpm macro is consitant. + Package doesn't own files or directories from other packeges + Mock build works fine. + License text seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstrem (md5sum: 19fe3ee10ee94a6003c53374112f2403) + Local install works fine. + Local uninstall works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review