[Bug 456084] Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456084


sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx  2008-07-21 15:44 EST -------

rpmlint has this to say:

gfs-garaldus-fonts.src: E: no-spec-file

OK  | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package…
OK  | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines…
OK  | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved…
OK  | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must…
OK  | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc
OK  | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK  | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build…
OK  | MUST: successfully compile, build 
OK  | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed…
OK  | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates
OK  | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files
OK  | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK  | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section
OK  | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
OK  | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible 
OK  | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already
OK  | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST…
OK  | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK  | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license 
OK  | SHOULD: The description and summary section … translations…
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds in mock
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures
OK  | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package…
OK  | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane…

Fix the odd rpmlint warning and you are APPROVED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]