Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA Connection Management library/API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450477 ------- Additional Comments From shawn.starr@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-03 19:07 EST ------- REVIEW ====== GOOD: + Mock build successful INFO: Done(librdmacm-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(default) 6 minutes 33 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/librdmacm-1.0.7-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/librdmacm-devel-1.0.7-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/librdmacm-utils-1.0.7-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/librdmacm-static-1.0.7-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/librdmacm-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc10.i386.rpm rpmlint ------- + librdmacm-utils: No errors/warnings + librdmacm-devel: No errors/warnings ! rpmlint reports the following warnings/errors: ? librdmacm.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/librdmacm-1.0.7/ChangeLog ? Not sure what we can do about that, It's upstream's problem for not putting in a valid ChangeLog. + librdmacm-static.i386: W: no-documentation + No doc for static is just fine. + Naming of RPMs generated is ok + License is fine (GPLv2 and BSD) + Permissions/ownership/dirs is ok Assuming we can't do anything about the ChangeLog, these RPMs look OK to me for submission. Please comment, then we'll mark this for cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review