Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-06-29 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > You still have to keep the release tag different between branches; without dist > you just have to do it manually, and even experienced packagers have issues. > Especially since you generally import into devel first, but its release has to > be higher than the others. Higher or equal. But indeed, it is less easy to bump in previous release without becoming greater than devel. However the dist really doesn't makes sense here. > You are absolutely correct about the doc directory; _texmf/doc/tex doesn't > actually seem to exist in the distro. I know I checked it, but > I was trusting you on the tetex-doc dependency; I honestly don't understand why > it would be necessary, but I'm not TeX expert and I figured it wouldn't really > hurt anything. (tetex/texlive)-doc holds the texdoc utility which can be used to view docs in the texmf tree. texlive-texmf-doc holds most of the documentation, and the _texmf/doc/latex is owned by texlive-texmf and texlive-texmf-doc. So the texlive-texmf or texlive-texmf-doc is in my opinion needed for directory owning. But (tetex/texlive)-doc is less needed, in my opinion, the doc can be viewed without texdoc. > Also, > since you seem to know more about TeX than I, are the texhash scriptlets really > necessary for the -doc package? Yes, they are if in the texmf tree, since then they can be accessed by texdoc which uses kpathsea to locate them. > Did the F8 tex packages grow the tex(latex) provides? It doesn't look like it > from here. No it doesn't, but I said in Comment #20 not to do it is F-8 is targeted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review