Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 cra@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cra@xxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From cra@xxxxxxx 2008-06-26 16:52 EST ------- On naming, it looks like most audacious plugin packages are named audacious-plugins-*. The only exception is audacious-plugin-fc. The "plugins" packages appear to be all built from a single audacious-plugins src.rpm, so it makes sense to use "plugins" for that. The fc plugin is a single plugin built from its own audacious-plugin-fc.src.rpm package. audacious.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 installed audacious-libs.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugin-fc.i386 0.2-6 installed audacious-plugins.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugins-amidi.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugins-vortex.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugins-wavpack.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed Available Packages audacious-devel.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-arts.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-esd.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-jack.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-metronome.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora Thoughts? "audacious-plugin-xmp" is consistent with the fc plugin, so I'm okay with that naming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review