Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-06-04 16:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Patrice, what possible value does an empty debuginfo package serve? It will only > confuse people who think they need it for debugging. I can't really see who could be confused. Unless I am wrong the static libs are not stripped so the symbols are in, and the empty debuginfo is unneeded anyway. And in my opinion no debuginfo package is not very less confusing than an empty debuginfo package. > Please either rationalize the need to keep it, or explicitly disable it. No rational. It is just that to me it should not be a requirement. It adds unnecessary work for the packager, unnecessary clutter in the specfile for no practical gain. And the bug is in rpmbuild. Anyway since this is already in the guidelines (but I think this is an unneeded rule, should only be a recommendation), updated src.rpm at: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib-1.6-3.fc10.src.rpm http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review