[Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236





------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-06-04 15:53 EST -------
We are not using "vendor" for the other Xfce packages as well (except for
xfce4-taskmanager), but I can change it if you like. Thinking about this a
little more I tend to agree with you: fedora-xfbib.desktop is better than
xfbib.desktop, because xfbib has no "xfce" prefix.

Do you want me to change this now or after/during review?

BTW: I just found another trivial error in %changelog: "Initial Fedora _Extras_
package" of course is wrong because there are no Extras any longer.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]