Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pa-monad - OCaml syntax extension for monads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435299 ------- Additional Comments From rjones@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-05-12 06:32 EST ------- Re: Naming I admit I didn't give it any thought. I just checked the Fedora naming guidelines and it seems like we could use pa_monad (since the upstream tarball is named that way), but for such a tiny package is it worth having a slightly different naming convention from all the other OCaml packages I wonder? Re: License Yes, you're right that this package doesn't have the OCaml linking exception. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-monad.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-monad-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Mon May 10 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.2.0-3 - Added a check section. - License doesn't include OCaml exception, just LGPLv2+. * Wed Mar 5 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.2.0-2 - Remove ExcludeArch ppc64. Here's a Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=604477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review