Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-05-06 10:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #53) > > IMNSHO, this package is of a too poor quality to let in into Fedora. > Do you see other problem than the etl_profile.h to say it's poor ? This bug alone a BLOCKER and a MUSTFIX. The problem behind this and the fact nobody has been able to come up with a quick-fix are caused by this package suffering from fundamental design flaws. > > In particular, none of its silly HAVE_ define issues have been fixed. > Well as ETL and synfig build fine i would only see this a an improvement. The point is: You are trying to ship ETL as standalone devel-package. The HAVE_ defines disqualifies it from such usages. > Many packages still use a config.h like package (for example mozilla-config.h > from mozilla/firefox/xulrunner). I haven't checked this particular case, but it's likely the a similar mis-design. There have been several of similar cases around, with some of them having been ironed out over time, and some of them not having been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review