Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 kwizart@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2008-05-06 06:05 EST ------- > IMNSHO, this package is of a too poor quality to let in into Fedora. Do you see other problem than the etl_profile.h to say it's poor ? > In particular, none of its silly HAVE_ define issues have been fixed. > Well as ETL and synfig build fine i would only see this a an improvement. Many packages still use a config.h like package (for example mozilla-config.h from mozilla/firefox/xulrunner). But as you disagree I won't object. NEED_WORK: remove all config.h like files from the package. Thoses need to be checked by the dependant application at configure time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review