Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254057 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-29 13:33 EST ------- > 1. As with all the e16 packages, you might ping upstream to relicence > to a more friendly license. Has there been any response so far? I talked to Kim, which maintains e16 now, was not directly against it, however there a lot of contributions to the now very old source code. Reaching consensus with everyone seems a bit off for such a old project. However it would make sense to change the license in - yet to be released - e17. It seems already to be changed to something like pure MIT: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/msg00020.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 http://enlightenment.org/viewvc/e17/apps/e/COPYING?revision=1.3 http://enlightenment.org/viewvc/e17/apps/e/COPYING-PLAIN?revision=1.1 > 2. rpmlint says: > > e16-docs.noarch: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising > e16-docs.src: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising It's should be fine, ref. e16 and e16-themes was ok with this. > 3. Is the only reason this package Requires e16 for the /usr/share/e16 directory? > If so, perhaps move it to a /usr/share/e16-docs/ dir and remove the Requires? The real reason is that docs don't make much sense without e16 and that document viewer for e16 help files is in e16. > 4. This package ships with 2 fonts, can you just Require > a needed font package for those? Or are those specific fonts needed? > /usr/share/e16/E-docs/Vera.ttf > /usr/share/e16/E-docs/VeraBd.ttf They are available in bitstream-vera-fonts, will fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review