Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-29 00:09 EST ------- PAM and LDAP support in HylaFAX enable authentication mechanisms for the hfaxd protocol that are alternatives to the etc/hosts.hfaxd file-based authentication method. Sure, pam-devel and openldap-devel should probably be build dependencies. The WARNING regarding /usr/bin/gs can be ignored. It's an installation dependency and not a build dependency. Furthermore, the configure-determined value is not built-in to binaries and can be configured by the administrator. Same goes for sendmail as for ghostscript. And mgetty is entirely optional. SPEC: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.2.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review