Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-28 16:44 EST ------- This new package does build for me. I wonder about these bits from the configure output: Checking for PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module) support ... not found. Disabling PAM support Checking for LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) support ... not found. Disabling LDAP support Is it worth adding build dependencies on pam-devel and openldap-devel? I can't say what functionality is missing but generally in Fedora we enable pam and ldap support for most programs. Looks like /usr/bin/gs is the PostScript RIP to use. WARNING, /usr/bin/gs does not seem to be an executable program; you may need to correct this before starting up the fax server. ls: cannot access /usr/bin/gs: No such file or directory ./configure: line 4180: /usr/bin/gs: No such file or directory Does this really matter, since it was explicitly directed to use /usr/bin/gs? Or does a build dependency ghostscript need to be added? There are similar complaints about sendmail and mgetty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review