Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 iphands@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(iphands@xxxxxxxxx)| ------- Additional Comments From iphands@xxxxxxxxx 2008-04-16 19:53 EST ------- Please excuse my absence... I have recently switched email addresses and have been busy. I do want to continue working on this as I feel this project will be used by some and it is an easy way for me to contribute to a project that gives the open source (one that I use, and depend on) alot. I wonder though; if because review requests are filed as bugs, it would be better for this to actually be closed and I can resubmit it after I have done some more work (and have a more time to dedicate to it). Is it bad to have one open while waiting on a sporadic contributer? Either way I don't mind. That being said I need to be pointed in the (general) direction of problem or documentation. I think I really need to go in and mess with the Makefile via the configure script so that it accepts rpm specific environment variables. How is the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT passed from rpmbuild to ./configure or make does it set BASH environment variable? I think the only reason the spec build was working for me is because I was root and thus stuff was getting installed on the system instead of in the proper temporary build root. Sorry if some of my rambling is hard to follow. Thanks, -Ian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review