Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-13 18:59 EST ------- Perhaps we're misunderstanding each other here. Its my understanding that the version number in the rpm should match the upstream source of the same version number (whats pointed to by the Source0: tag in my spec file). On that I think we both agree. Please correct me if I'm wrong What you've noticed is that I've posted several rpms to this bug, all of which have the same version number, different revision numbers but contain the same file set (i.e. no patches against the new revisions). The implication that you're concerned with here, if I'm understanding your concern, is that clearly I've then modified the pristine source tarball that I'm pointing at. And thats badness. Nominally thats just not something that should be done. I've been making the changes in my upstream git tree in parallel, updating the tarball on fedorahosted, and rebuilding the pakage with the same version. The only reason that I'm doing it now is that you're having me make minor cleanups to this package in preparation for release to Fedora, and I'd really like to have the first release of the package be identical to the first release of the tarball on the hosted site (silly I know, its just an OCD idosyncracy of mine). Its really just for convienience right now while you're reviewing this package. Once you give it the green light, I'll certainly not make changes to the 0.4 revision upstream. That tag will stay fixed, and I'll bump the version number. Does that adequately describe and satisfy your concerns? Thanks for all your dilligent work on this review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review