Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 ------- Additional Comments From feliciano.matias@xxxxxxx 2008-03-13 18:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Its not the best thing to do, > but I really don't want to go bumping upstream version numbers You are the "boss", you are the developer and I really appreciate you work. You have the last word. But I am not requesting for "bumping upstream version numbers", but the respect of a convention that, AFAIK everybody respect. > I really don't want to go bumping upstream version numbers for a man page fix here and there. I understand. But does it matter if fuse-s3fs-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm through fuse-s3fs-0.4-6.fc8.src.rpm was fuse-s3fs-0.4.1-1.fc8.src.rpm and fuse-s3fs-0.4.6-1.fc8.src.rpm ? Is it matter if I have : $ rpm -q -l -p fuse-s3fs-0.4-4.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4-6.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 fuse-s3fs.spec fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 # "wrong" fuse-s3fs.spec Or : $ rpm -q -l -p fuse-s3fs-0.4-4.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4-6.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 patch-cvs-20080310.diff fuse-s3fs.spec fuse-s3fs-0.4.tbz2 patch-cvs-20080313.diff fuse-s3fs.spec Or : $ rpm -q -l -p fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080310-0.fc8.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080313-0.fc8-0.src.rpm fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080310.tbz2 fuse-s3fs.spec fuse-s3fs-0.5.cvs20080313.tbz2 fuse-s3fs.spec I don't know exactly how to deal with this. But I am quite sure some packagers guru have the right answer. Also, I am not sure koji can handle "soft" tagged version. I suppose koji have some cache system. > version numbers for a man page If you release fuse-s3fs 0.4.1, 0.4.2, etc, use "this man page cover version 0.4.x (or just 0.4)". Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review