Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 ------- Additional Comments From feliciano.matias@xxxxxxx 2008-03-11 04:04 EST ------- It's "Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3)". http://aws.amazon.com/s3 fuse-as3fs ? http://aws.amazon.com/ (Amazon Web Services) fuse-awss3fs ? > the project on fedora hosted. It's the latest project. To be honest I don't really care. Your (a|aws|any way)s3fs seems very promising and packaging it is really helpful. Many thanks. But I think https://fedorahosted.org/s3fs/ should at least mention that "s3fs" is used by other similar projets. Some feedback : With the "-C" flag ? "s3fs -c|-r|-d|-f" require one argument (the bucket). "s3fs bucket mountpoint" requires two arguments (btw, does not work, only "s3fs -o bucket=xxx mountpoint" works). Proposition : s3fs -h # help s3fs -c|-d|-r|-f bucket s3fs -m bucket mountpoint # '-m' optional ? s3fs -u mountpoint # umount (or the documentation should point to "fusermount -u") Options : [-o AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=xxx,AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=xxx] Or -a xxx (access key) -s xxx (secret key) Environment variables are fine also and convenient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review