Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: s3fs - Fuse |Review Request: fuse-s3fs - |filesystem for amazon.com's |Fuse filesystem for |S3 storage service |amazon.com's S3 storage | |service ------- Additional Comments From nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-10 22:44 EST ------- New spec/rpm http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs.spec http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/fuse-s3fs-0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm I've renamed the package to fuse-s3fs and removed the mount.s3fs binary. as for the google code reference, yes, I found that after I created the project on fedora hosted. I'd really rather not give up the name, given that the google code project isn't packaged and its particularly descriptive. It looks like there are actually multiple google code projects for s3fs. One (s3fs-fuse) is a python implementation that hasn't been touched in over a year. The other, s3fs, is a c++ implementation that has only seen recent activity (much like my project). As there are actively multiple project competing for the name, I'd prefer not to give up my claim on it. Neither of the other projects have been packaged, or are looking to be packaged for Fedora or any other distro (at least not publically that I can find). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review