[Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scidavis


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973





------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-03-09 11:59 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > 1.) URLs from download from sourceforge
> > Ok
> 
> Thanks, the changes are fine.
> 
> > > 2.) Try to specify an URL for these:
> > > 
> > > Source5:	application-x-scidavis.svg
> > > Source6:	application-x-scidavis-32x32.png
> > > Source7:	application-x-scidavis-48x48.png
> > > Source8:	application-x-scidavis-128x128.png
> > > 
> > > Or at least a comment where did you get those.
> > > Is it needed to include the pngs?
> > > 
> > 
> > They come from the svn version. I had some exchange with upstream about how to
> > handle desktop and mime and this will be incuded in the next version.
> 
> This still doesn't seem correct to me. Is this the file?
>
http://scidavis.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/scidavis/trunk/icons/scidavis-icon.svg?revision=709
> 
> If yes, please either specify it in Source: and rename when installing it, or at
> least put a comment above it.
> 
> And the pngs -- are they needed? When it comes to icons; SVG is generally
> sufficient.

The files are from
http://scidavis.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/scidavis/branches/current_stable/scidavis/icons/
and it seems that the svg file is not sufficient

> 
> How about untarring it in %prep after %setup of Source0?
> Either just untar it to directory where you are after it, or make some
> constructive use of %setup macro. It can take a variety of useful, yet somewhat
> tricky options: see [1].
> 
> [1] http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html

It seems now doc are better handled but i have a problem : the scidavis-manual
package have the doc in /usr/share/doc/scidavis-manual-0.1.2/ but the scidavis
binary file will look for manual in /usr/share/doc/scidavis-0.1.2/manual/

is it possible to do this ?

> Thanks for your improvements to the spec file, I'll continue the review once doc
> files are properly dealt with. Feel free to ask for help if you need any.

Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]