Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 pertusus@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx) ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-03-03 11:39 EST ------- 2 issues remaining: The %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/EUC-UCS2 %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-H %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-V files ownership. Jindriiiiiich? The release is 0.20.... while dvipdfmx coming from current texlive is 19. It is bad. I suggest using directly 20, even if it is against the guideline, and use something like 20.1.20071115cvs to avoid going higher than 20, since dvipdfmx in texlive is already wrong. Another possibility would be to use epochs, but I think we should avoid as much as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review