Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-17 19:24 EST ------- > perhaps use Source0: Whoops. Fixed. Rev 1 also came with a problematic server init script. Fixed. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc-2.18.3-2.fc8.src.rpm A couple of open-ended question: - The server RPM won't "start" as shipped. This is by design, in the sense that distcc is a tool that really needs to be configured manually (and carefully). One could argue that we should ship with '--allow 127.0.0.1' by default, but that configuration is not useful in itself, so I prefer the first option, but I'm open for discussion. - In the same spirit of keeping the package simple and not doing too much configuration, I did not add a logrotate and separate log file, but chose to let the default syslog behavior. However it seems distccd has a tendency to spam /var/log/messages quite a lot, so I'm having second thoughts about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review